RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00888

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service,  be 
corrected in Item 23, Authority and Reason, to remove “AFI 36-
3209, Paragraph 3.22: discharge in the interest of national 
security, SPD: JDK.”  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He has a copy of his three credit reports and his criminal 
history whose contents should not stop him from being in the 
military.  

In support of his request, but not listed on his DD Form 149, 
the applicant submits copies of his NGB 22, documents pertaining 
to his discharge, and copies of his credit reports from, 
Experian, Transunion, and Equifax.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Georgia Air National Guard on 
12 August 2008 and was separated from service on 27 April 2012.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force at Exhibit C.  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

1.  NGB/A1PP recommends denial.  A1PP states ANGI 36-2002, 
Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a 
Reserve of the Air Force, Table 4.4. Rule 19 notes, members who 
receive a “6U” RE code will be ineligible for reenlistment.  The 
“JDK” SPD code identifies the applicant was separated for 
security reasons such as an inability to obtain a security 
clearance due to financial concerns.  AFI 36-3209, Separation 
and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force 
Reserve Members, section 3.22 states, when a member is unable to 
obtain the level of clearance for an assignment or projected 
duty assignment the characterization of service will be general, 
under honorable condition.  

The complete NGB/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

NGB/A1P states they concur with the NGB/A1PP advisory. 

The complete NGB/A1P evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 31 March 2013 for review and comment within 30 
days.  To date, a response has not been received.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.  

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt 
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 5 November 2013, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603:

			, Panel Chair
			, Member
			, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149 dated 15 February 2013, w/atchs.  
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 4 March 2013.  
    Exhibit D.  Letter, NGB/A1P, dated 8 March 2013.  
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 March 2013.  




                                   
                                   Panel Chair